🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.