🔗 Share this article

Through a unattributed decision, the U.S. Supreme Court permitted Texas to use a newly configured congressional map that could add as many as five new conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three order, released on Thursday, grants a appeal by the state to lift a district court's injunction that had rejected the boundaries in November.

Justices' Rationale

The district court improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, causing significant confusion and disrupting the fine federal-state balance in elections, the justices wrote in justifying its decision.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had probably grouped voters according to their race – a practice known as illegal race-based districting – when it adopted the boundaries. It had mandated the state to employ the districts established after the last decennial survey for the upcoming election.

Sharp Opposition

In a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's decision. She argued that it disregarded the work of the lower court, observing that its ruling was written by a judge selected by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan wrote in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, Today's ruling solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas citizens, without justification, will be grouped in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has declared year in and year out, is a violation of the constitution.

National Redistricting Struggle

The court's action comes amid a countrywide contest over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to bolster a fragile Republican control. Usually, redistricting takes place after a decennial population count. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a series of events among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that could add a number of additional conservative seats. The opposition, meanwhile, have pushed back with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Partisan Reactions

The Texas AG praised the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes supportive of his party. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

On the other hand, opposition party representatives criticized the decision. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the head of a major party campaign committee.

Another senior Democratic leader stated the court had yet again damaged its standing by approving a race-based map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he added.